Vivek, >From the wiki on ATI Radeon, in the troubleshooting section [1]:
----------- This could be caused by having multiple versions of libGL.so on your system. Run: $ sudo updatedb $ locate libGL.so This should return the following output: $ locate libGL.so /usr/lib/libGL.so /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 $ These are the only three libGL.so files you should have on your system. If you have any more (eg. /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2), then remove them. This should fix your problem. ----------- Try removing the extra libGL.so files, and see if that helps. - Cerebral [1] http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ATI_Radeon_%26_Kernel_2.6#Direct_Rendering_Doesn.27t_Work On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:18:53 -0400 "Vivek Ayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's the xorg.conf file. Sorry > > On 7/13/06, Vivek Ayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I haven't been getting 3D acceleration with my 9700 pro for the past > > few months now. I really didn't care b/c mesa was giving 2D > > acceleration. Anyways, with kernel26beyond, I got the latest ati > > beyond package and utils package and follow proper protocol in the > > xorg.conf file, but when I check for 3D acceleration with > > fglrxinfo, I get: > > > > display: :0.0 screen: 0 > > OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org > > OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect > > OpenGL version string: 1.2 (1.5 Mesa 6.4.2) > > > > ...Also...when I run fgl_glxgears I get: > > > > Using GLX_SGIX_pbuffer > > X Error of failed request: BadLength (poly request too large or > > internal Xlib length error) > > Major opcode of failed request: 16 (X_InternAtom) > > Serial number of failed request: 26 > > Current serial number in output stream: 29 > > > > I don't what error this is, but I'm pretty sure I followed the > > archlinux wiki protocol. I'll attach my xorg.conf file and see if > > you all see any errors. I don't I wasn't having these errors before > > > > One thing I did realize. Another thread mentioned something about a > > bad libGL.so.1.2 file. Could that be the problem? I slocated my > > system for this file and found two at the locations: > > > > /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 created July 2, 2006 (with latest update) & > > > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2 modified October 3, 2005. > > > > Is there a conflict here? Should I use the old one since it was > > working before? Help appreaciated. Thanks. > > > > Vivek > > _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
