On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 12:25 -0500, Askadar wrote:
> A re-branding to ArchBrowser (or something similar) would be nice,
> though. "Bon Echo" is terrible, but is still a nice piece of software
> that I
> enjoy to use after all.
I would go for GNU IceWeazel, just like Debian is heading for. The
problem with iceweazel is that it's 1.5, while "Bon Echo" is 2.0. I
guess the mozilla guys haven't noticed the name yet, I can't believe a
non-official build of firefox 1.5 has been named "Deer Park" for the
whole release cycle.
_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
Is it too hard to provide a non patched version (and so legally "official") of FF? Maybe in Extra? At least a PKGBUILD on AUR?
Or those patches are really "can't live without"?
BTW, I couldnt wait to have FF 2 on my machine and I installed it off-package. After Arch got the package, I installed the package and noticed that the fonts got a bit ugly. Is that related?
--
Abraços,
Rodrigo
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
