2006/12/13, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The only thing that it would change IMHO is the place to get patches > from. There's nothing in the article about the licensing and trademark > issues.
Yeah, you're right, but in my understanding this looks like a collaboration proposal to solve these problems. No Mozilla way, no Debian way, just another path. That's what I was asking about: are we with them or not? Anyway, in the end of the article there's a link to another blog which states: "Now, some of you may be saying that this solves most Linux issues, but not the Debian issue. I haven't forgotten them. I've also talked to Alexander Sack of Debian, who's put a lot of effort into the Mozilla browsers, about how to make Mozilla upstream be in line with the DFSG and I'm pushing those items back up. So far I've heard positive results, but as all things like this, will take time. Stay tuned for more." (Taken from: http://christopher.aillon.org/blog/dev/mozilla/20061204-linux-alliance.html) This looks more interesting from your POV, even though there's still no specs about the whole thing. bardo _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
