2007/1/12, Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > One of the big advantage of arch is that the building of packages is realy the > best understable way what i know. The only advantage of rpm is that you can > build more than one package with one spec file but it is realy harder to read > the spec file than a PKGBUILD.-)
IIRC Frugalware have this in their pacman-g2. But I doubt it is useful enough for Arch. > It was time that they all come together because at this moment at example you > can't take a rpm for redhat and install it on a suse system. I have heard > that this is same for ubuntu and debian but i don't know it exactly. That's > why the big distros need this and arch don't need it at this moment from my > view. Agree. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич) _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
