> it would be wise of course to place them in > testing for a while... :-)
I don't want to appear an old conservative, but IMHO tetex should not be simply replaced by texlive; they are different packages with different purposes and characteristics, even if they share the core. I mean: they should at least co-exist for a while in the extra repositories, maybe with tetex flagged 'deprecated', and tetex should be abandoned only in a year or so (maybe for the 0.9 or 0.10 iso). They're huge packages, I don't see the point to force the users to move from the actual fine running tetex. Me, for exemple, I would not test texlive until I'm done with my thesis ;) Marco _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
