On Friday 02 Mar 2007, Vladimir Koshelenko wrote: > Здравствуйте. > > В сообщении от 1 марта 2007 Hussam Al-Tayeb написал(a): > > That's true. Manufacturers have to pay Microsoft "US$0.25 per unit". > > In any case, I doubt there are any other patent infringements other than > > the FAT issue. > > Is NTFS patented? > > > Also, can't I just recompile my kernel without FAT file system support? > > You can simply delete fat.ko & vfat.ko > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
No pantent is "known" as far as I know for NTFS, but have always taken fat and ntfs out. -- Guillermo A. Amaral, CSE @ site: http://www.guillermoamaral.com/ @ blog: http://blog.guillermoamaral.com/ # nick: thewonka | thewonka81 > pkey: http://www.guillermoamaral.com/downloads/public.asc
pgpRxYc4tEwqI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
