On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 12:08:30PM +0200, Peter Feuerer wrote: > Hi archers, > > I was wondering, why you don't tag the extra repo with the release tags > like you do with the current repo? That should not be such a big effort. > > Additionally it would be great to have at least the packages of the > extra repo (maybe also the once of the community repo) of every arch > release stored somewhere. This would enable to get a real (with desktop > environment and so on) installation of arch of the time the release x.y. > was launched. Because I dont think the base packages are enough, if > somebody wants to stick to a release. > > --peter
One single question: why? Arch is meant to be rolling-release-distro. It is not intended to "stick with a release". The releases are just there to make the installation easier. If you want to stick with a release, you most likeley chose the wrong distribution. Christian // mucknert -- My Public GnuPG-Key: http://craphouse.ath.cx/~christian/pub/gpg/
pgpZliNPFIZBM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
