On Saturday 07 April 2007, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > Sorry for that, actually I would say it was "upper" post, but not "top" > post.
The correct form is top ;) > > The purpose of such a request is to avoid forks? As said by the RFC 1855: "If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you summarize the original at the top of the message, or include just enough text of the original to give a context. This will make sure readers understand when they start to read your response." > But sometimes someone may want to reply to "upper" message because of > certain context... Certain context? I can't see where ;) However, that's not the "right" way to reply in mailing lists.
pgpOdCFbWQe5i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
