Hello All, I like the new idea, the only thing I don't totally approve is the numbering system (YYYYMM). Since we're following more a kernel numbering system I would have used this characteristics. Like the next version could have been 2.6.22 or 2.6.24 but I don't know how to manage the trouble of having so many digits ;)
Or something like Arch2 6.22, And when the new kernel is released, we could go to Arch3 2.1 (like Kernel 3.2.1) but I think it's taking to much place... that was just a suggestion... No good! :) Michel
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
