On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 01:00:41AM +1000, James wrote: > On 4/21/07, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 4/19/07, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just wondered if it would be great to have a special mailing list to > > > which > > > all cvs-commits are sent? This was introduced at pacman-dev and I think > > > this > > > is very usefull. (I think especially for those who port packages from > > > i686 to > > > x86_64 and those who maintain packages which depend on packages > > > maintained by > > > someone elese) > > > > > > In addition to this it would be nice if extratpkg would ask for a comment > > > by > > > default and not just use "updpkg". > > > > > > There should be one list for current/extra/testing/unstable and one for > > > community. > > > > Yep, it's being talked about. I'm currently in the process of setting > > something up. > > ref: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2007-April/000304.html > > > > I agree on the one for community, but that will probably come after > > this current one when I see how it works. arch-commits and > > aur-commits perhaps /me shrugs > > > > I actually plan on getting this one done tonight, if I don't get too busy. > > I don't see how much use it is for packages, beyond for porters. Maybe > it ought to be opt-in, rather than opt-out? I really don't mind what > you do with gxine, or tomk does with openssl, you're both more than > capable of maintaining them properly. > > James
This is what I was trying to say. Aaron probably shouldn't have subscribed all the devs to the arch-commits list, but it's still easy enough to get yourself off the list. No harm done. Jason
pgpGoKzobxHml.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
