> It might not be that important, but I think the year should be first and > perhaps we might want to cut it down to 7.05. This way the version numbers > are in order (compare: 05-2007 < 01-2008...) and a short number is easier > to > handle.
The name should certainly be numerically sortable with expected results. Generally a YYYYMMDD format is recommended. This could certainly be modified to be more 'eye pleasing', but I would put a strong emphasis on the need to be numerically date sortable. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
