2007/5/9, Georg Grabler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I havn't had a look at [current] before. > > Let me tell you the interpretation for me. > For me, [current] should hold base packages. So packages needed to run > the system. For me, it could be named "base" as well. Extra is > everything i don't need to install to have a system up and running, > but what gives me extra programs which i can use, as the desktop > system of my choice, chat applications, word processing etc. etc. > Maybe, also a split into [base] [current] [extra] [community], > providing system relevant tools, console tools and similar and extra > for gui things. The community also could be split up in console / gui. > I head for (in example) for a system without any gui installation, i > won't need to update all the dbs all the time - since i don't use them > anyway (as my servers).
There was decission made that we will strip Current to Core repo which will include Base category and useful packages from Current (X.org, dbus, hal, apache, samba etc.). Everything else from Current will go to Extra (additionally everything unneeded will go to AUR). forgot to post this in my previous message: 2007/5/9, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 17:17 +0200, Georg Grabler wrote: > > Heya. > > > > Beryl - merged with compiz > Didn't beryl fork from compiz and change lots of things? or are both > actually the same nowadays? They merged again :) AFAIR Compiz will contain core, while Coral will contain extra Beryl's plugins. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич) _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
