On 9/4/07, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Point taken, but: > > > > Why not call it apache-httpd then? > > > > 'httpd' remains a very generic word. > > This has been the name of the Apache Foundation's webserver for quite > a while now. > It is standard, and easily recognizable as such. > > It would venture to guess that it would cause more problems for many > of the server admins out there to change the name of it to something > that is less standardized and quickly recognizable. >
well those guys refer to their own project as "The Apache HTTP Server project" (http://httpd.apache.org/), so well... oh, what the hey. :) -jf -- In the meantime, here is your PSA: "It's so hard to write a graphics driver that open-sourcing it would not help." -- Andrew Fear, Software Product Manager, NVIDIA Corporation http://kerneltrap.org/node/7228 _______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
