Alexandre Moreira wrote:
> On 9/21/07, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Elyess ZOUAGHI wrote:
>>> personnaly i dont want to have a
>>> complete package like gambas installed because i only need its runtime
>>> and this goes for very other packages.
>>>
>>>
>> Is this going to end up with a whole heap of foo-dev packages like what
>> happens on other distributions... I gave up on some distributions
>> because I was getting annoyed with that.  Perhaps I was just too stupid
>> to remember to install them!
>>
>> I do see this extension to makepkg as a possible way to automatically
>> fix one of the oldest bugs in the database -
>> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/3459 .
> 
> I've read this bug and noticed that a common problem many users have
> in this list is the idea of having -dev, -doc or -whatever packages
> that need to be fetched.
> 
> What if we could add a way that the -dev, -doc, -* packages are really
> sub-packages, instead of a different package. And one could have a
> list of standardized sub packages he wants to always install ?
> 
> That way (if we can find a simple way of doing this) a user could set
> a pacman config flag that says it always want to install, even when
> not directly needed by some dependency, so a user that wants all the
> devs can add the dev option and have it behave (with split packages)
> just like it is now.

this is one of the most unique ideas i've read all day!
> 
> I would surely like having split packages but I have to agree that
> many users will be unhappy with having to fetch different packages for
> dev and stuff like that.
> 
> I just believe we should investigate more the idea of true
> sub-packages (much like in Windows' .msi files, the way you can
> install parts of a software) instead of simply generating more
> packages without real connection between them.
> 
>> Allan
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> arch mailing list
>> arch@archlinux.org
>> http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> arch@archlinux.org
> http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> 


_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to