----- Original Message ----- > From: "Karsten 'quaid' Wade" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 5:48:24 PM > Subject: Re: freenode vs. oftc > > > I know this is quickly turning into a bikeshed post, but from my > > point of view we have taken this from what should have been a > > fairly simple problem (choose a network) and found the one solution > > which is even worse (both). > > My last post wasn't intended to say 'both', it was intended to say, > 'keep OFTC and move any traffic on Freenode to OFTC'. (Call that my > low-energy solution.) There were multiple questions in this > discussion > since there are some projects on Freenode, some on OFTC. One question > was to move the canonical channel, no reason was found, and it > appeared more related projects were on OFTC already. Another question > is what to do with #ovirt on Freenode. > > So long way around, the final question above results in your > proposal, > "Return #ovirt on Freenode's kickban + clear message to go to OFTC", > to which I add, "And request other oVirt discussions on Freenode to > move to OFTC." That seems workable for the current need. > > If you agree to that proposal, I reckon we have your +1 and I'll > remain +0 for now.
In a nutshell yes, that is what I would propose we should do going forward. Steve _______________________________________________ Arch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
