On 04/17/2012 04:31 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 09:20 -0400, Ofer Schreiber wrote:As decided earlier, oVirt next release (3.1) is targeted for Fedora 17. Since the engine uses JBoss, we have two deployment options: 1. Continue working with ovirt-engine-jbossas package PROS: Single rpm. known upgrade method. CONS: Maintaining un-natural zip based rpm. No official support. Can't be pushed into Fedora.2. Move to JBoss F17 official packages: PROS: Fully supported F17 rpms (including bug fixes, security fixes, etc). "The right thing to do". CONS: Upgrade from first release (relaying on old jboss) will be almost impossible, Some open issues (will it work just as as normal service? or will we need to code a new one?), Might cause a delay to Feature Freeze.Quick thoughts -- this will come up for every release until we decide on #2. The con for #2 will always be there until we finally switch over. I think it's less impact to have a more manual upgrade between release 1 and 2 than between later releases. As long as we can provide at least a manual upgrade process with well defined steps so that the early adopters don't have to re-create their environments, I think we should go with #2.
+1 _______________________________________________ Arch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
