On 04/18/2012 09:51 AM, Ofer Schreiber wrote: > Ever wondered why the version of oVirt's first release is 3.0.0_0001? > The answer is simple - We use ovirt-engine jar's version as our "main" > release version. > > Personally, I think the current versioning scheme is ugly. Actually, I can't > name even one open-source project using "_" in it's version. > > What can we do about it? We have couple of options: > 1. Leave the engine alone, and use a separate versioning scheme (e.g - use > just 3.1.0 as the main version for next release) > 2. Remove "_" from engine jars > 3. Do nothing. > > I'd like to hear your thoughts, as well as the reasons to use such an unusual > versioning scheme. > > --- > Ofer Schreiber > oVirt Release Manager > _______________________________________________ > Arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>From my point of view using the 0001 suffix in the names of the jar files is not a big problem, but I agree that using it in the release number is ugly, and it produces issues/discussions during packaging. I vote for option #1: use 3.1.0 for the next main version. -- Dirección Comercial: C/Jose Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3ºD, 28016 Madrid, Spain Inscrita en el Reg. Mercantil de Madrid – C.I.F. B82657941 - Red Hat S.L. _______________________________________________ Arch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
