ack, like the idea.
On 09/05/2012 11:09 AM, Andrew Cathrow wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Jon Benedict" <[email protected]> >> To: "Mike Burns" <[email protected]>, "board" <[email protected]>, "arch" >> <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2012 11:06:04 AM >> Subject: Re: New Role Proposal in the oVirt Project >> >> On 9/5/12 10:57 AM, "Mike Burns" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> Given some of the difficulties we've had recently with planning and >>> getting releases pulled together, I'd like to propose we have a new >>> role >>> in the Project. >>> >>> Project Manager >>> >>> Responsibilities: >>> >>> Maintain Schedule >>> Run weekly meeting >>> Coordinate with project maintainers on dates, features, etc >>> Ensure that docs and release materials are ready for release >>> Final say on what goes into a release >>> Tracking new features >>> Tracking action items >>> >>> This person should be empowered to make decisions for the project >>> (based >>> on input from maintainers, but final call is theirs). >>> >>> As for choosing this person, it could be done via general election >>> on >>> email or an IRC meeting. I'd suggest having someone do it for a >>> limited >>> timeline, maybe 2 or 3 releases, max, then someone else takes over. >>> >>> Any thoughts, suggestions, comments? > Yep a program manager type role would be valuable. > >> >> Mike, >> >> I'm definitely in favor of a PM. I like the 2-3 term requirement, but >> if >> they want to serve again it should be an option (subject to >> re-election). >> >> Jon >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Board mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/board >> > _______________________________________________ > Arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch _______________________________________________ Arch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
