Il 22/01/2014 14:57, Dan Kenigsberg ha scritto: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:40:33AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: >> Hi, >> I think that having the same package on different repositories must be >> avoided. >> >> The last python-cpopen-1.3 release broke repository closure of ovirt-stable >> which provides a vdsm release still requiring vdsm-python-cpopen. >> I think that since vdsm and other packages are delivered in Fedora >> repositories we should not deliver them in ovirt repositories. >> An example is: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056470 >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056464 >> >> python-cpopen affects both Fedora and oVirt repositories, hitting 2 >> different products. >> but other packages are handled as vdsm. >> So i suggest to keep just .tar.gz files on ovirt site for allowing fedora >> packagers to build referencing the source tarball and drop at all any >> package already provided by Fedora from ovirt site. >> >> Comments as always are welcome. > > Only problem with this is that epel would not agree to ship the el6 > build of rpm - we'd need to carry it on our own.
with epel we won't have duplicates in different repos > > Dan. > -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com _______________________________________________ Arch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
