Hi Adam, While we did publish Arches v1.0 as an AMI, we (e.g.: Farallon) aren't planning on doing that for v3 for a couple of reasons.
Mostly, we think Arches v3.0 should be a lot easier to install from scratch, so its not clear that having an AMI pre-installed with Arches would be all that helpful. For what its worth, we do make extensive use of AMI's to host Arches, and they work great. You're right that they are an easy and convenient way to quickly get production ready instances of Arches going. Of course, there's nothing stopping some one else from setting up and managing an AMI if they want. Cheers, Dennis On Friday, December 19, 2014 6:59:52 AM UTC-8, Adam Cox wrote: > > Hello all, > > I was recently looking back through the documentation for Arches 1.0, and > saw that there was at one point an AMI published in the Amazon Web Services > specifically for Arches. I don't see that AMI around anymore, and I was > wondering if that is something that will be revisited with the version 3.0 > release. I've recently become familiar with using Amazon's EC2 web > services, and it seems like it would be a cheap, easy, and fast way to do > production-worthy installations of Arches. > > Cheers, > Adam > -- -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]. For more information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Arches Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
