Hi James, Personally I'd like to see more of these questions raised on this group, so not off-topic at all for me. What you have expressed here is a user need for a piece of information to be recorded, analysed, shared etc - so Arches needs to be able to accomodate that. In England, an influential document which I believe draws on Australian experience David cited is available at https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/professional/advice/conservation-principles/ConservationPrinciples/ That also sets out a values-based approach to setting priorities, with the 'formula' being that significance is the sum of all the ascribed values, with priority given to those sites that are both higher in significance, and at greatest risk of loss of that significance. Hope that helps, Ed
On Sunday, January 25, 2015 at 6:18:31 AM UTC, James wrote: > Hi all, > > I have an off-topic question but I think it is a question that the > professionals who use Arches deal with on a daily basis: How do you > prioritize conservation projects for the sites that you are responsible > for? > -- -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]. For more information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Arches Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
