Hi Adam I thought I'd deleted this post because after writing it I realised that my RDM problem is a little different! I thought this was probably a documentation problem only, thank you for looking into it and confirming it.
My RDM problem is this: I am only using the RDM to change the authority files because I am a user and we don't have a full time IT staff member assigned to our project yet so can't change the files directly. I used the sample files as a basis and added our concepts for the heritage resource type and deleted the sample ones. I did the same for the resource classification types. I then added the appropriate concepts to the drop down lists for each. When I tried inputting a resource, I found that the resource classification drop down list was where I expected the heritage resource list and vice versa. The concepts were the ones I had input. I cannot give you copies of the files but I took screen shots of the problem and can upload them tomorrow when I am back at work. But I checked and double checked that I had input the concepts in the correct places. Have you come across this problem before? Lucy Sent from my iPad > On 27 Oct 2015, at 19:07, Adam Cox <[email protected]> wrote: > > HI Lucy, I looked into this, and saw the same thing in the documentation. I > went back to the HIP resource graphs and pulled new tables for the > documentation straight from them. Looks like it was a typo in the > documentation, because the graphs don't seem to have the mix up > (documentation should be fixed now). > > If you are finding a problem in the RDM, could you post more information > about it? > > Thanks for pointing out the issue, > Adam > >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Lucy FJ <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have been successfully inputting our own authority files through the RDM >> but then came across a strange problem: the heritage group type seems to be >> confused with the heritage resource type. On checking the documentation, the >> appendices showing each resource graph, I found the same thing: >> Under the graph: Heritage Resource E18, exists >> Heritage_Resource_group_Type_Authority Document.E32 but under the graph: >> Heritage Resource Group. E27 exists >> Heritage_Resource_Type_Authority_Document.E32 >> >> Surely these should be the other way round? Is the documentation confused, >> the actual installation confused or am I confused? >> >> Many thanks for your help, >> >> Lucy >> -- >> -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, >> send email to [email protected]. For more >> information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Arches Project" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]. For more information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Arches Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
