Looks great!

Director of Web Development - Farallon Geographics, Inc. - 971.227.3173

On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Angela Labrador <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have made a ticket on Bitbucket for this (Issue #299 - I hope I did this
> right).
>
>
> https://bitbucket.org/arches/arches3/issues/299/support-for-private-place-data
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Alexei Peters <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Angela could you make a ticket for this?   People can then upvote that
>> issue so that we can gauge it's importance to the community.
>> Thanks,
>> Alexei
>>
>>
>> Director of Web Development - Farallon Geographics, Inc. - 971.227.3173
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:24 AM, Edmund Lee <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I would second this (+1) as a valuable additional feature for Arches.
>>> While personally I'm very much on the Open Information side, there are
>>> sites which need to be managed (and receorded in systems such as Arches)
>>> without making precise locational information availailable to all.
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 4:11:40 PM UTC, Angela Labrador wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> Apologies if this has already been addressed:
>>>>
>>>> I'm dealing with a use case wherein a particular heritage site's
>>>> location is "Not for publication" but still needs to be tracked within
>>>> Arches by authenticated users. The ACL grants permissions per node, and I
>>>> have not found a flag that allows for per instance override (e.g. by
>>>> default all locations are available to anonymous users, but if field_x=true
>>>> or address_type="private" then the place data are only available to
>>>> authenticated users).
>>>>
>>>> Since this is a common issue with archaeological sites and certain
>>>> Indigenous and sacred sites, I'm wondering how others have dealt with this
>>>> or if I'm missing something obvious.
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks,
>>>> Angela
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To
>>> unsubscribe, send email to [email protected].
>>> For more information, visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Arches Project" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To
>> unsubscribe, send email to [email protected].
>> For more information, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>> Google Groups "Arches Project" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/archesproject/mcGTbq9nK58/unsubscribe.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
-- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, send 
email to [email protected]. For more information, 
visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Arches Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to