Yes, I have a situation where a couple of branches on the graph could recycle the same sub-branch. However, renaming the nodes will be ok, because the node name/entity type that shows up in the search auto-complete will make more sense in the long run. I'm just trying to recycle nodes and forms where possible, so I thought I'd double check.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 3:53 AM, Carlisle, Philip < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Adam, > > During the creation of the original graphs we encounter the situation > where two nodes with the same name led to 2 separate branches converging at > the node (START_DATE.E49 was a common one) this meant that we had to use > very specific names for each individual node eg. START_DATE_OF _EXISTENCE > and FROM_DATE otherwise the node wouldn’t know which value to associate > with which branch. > > > > Now whether this was just the way Gephi handled it or whether it actually > causes an issue is debatable but I’d err on the side of caution and > differentiate them somehow. > > > > Phil > > > > *Phil Carlisle* > > Data Standards Supervisor > > Data Standards Unit, Listing Group > > Historic England > > The Engine House > > Fire Fly Avenue > > Swindon > > SN2 2EH > > Tel: +44 (0)1793 414824 > > > > http://thesaurus.historicengland.org.uk/ > > http://www.heritagedata.org/blog/ > > > > Heritage Data Management fosters an environment where colleagues are > valued for their skills and knowledge, and where communication, customer > focus and working in partnership are at the heart of everything we do. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Adam Cox > *Sent:* 27 April 2016 18:07 > *To:* Arches Project > *Subject:* [Arches] identical nodes within the same resource graph? > > > > Hello all, I know that the same nodes can be used by multiple resource > types, but I'm wondering if it's ok to have the same nodes occur in two > different branches of the same graph. I just constructed a graph in this > manner, and reinstalling the package went smoothly. However, I'm wondering > if I'll run into issues when I am updating these branches with the forms, > or iterating them for display in the reports. > > > > Thanks, > > Adam > > -- > -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, > send email to [email protected]. For more > information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Arches Project" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > We are the public body that looks after England's historic environment. We > champion historic places, helping people to understand, value and care for > them, now and for the future. > Sign up to our enewsletter to keep up to date with our latest news, advice > and listings. > HistoricEngland.org.uk Twitter: @HistoricEngland > > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal > views which are not the views of Historic England unless specifically stated. > If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system and > notify the sender immediately. Do not use, copy or disclose the information > in any way nor act in reliance on it. Any information sent to Historic > England may become publicly available. > > > > -- -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]. For more information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Arches Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
