I second that, awesome to hear that this is in scope for the near future!

Thanks Alexei,

Vincent


On Jul 22, 2017 4:32 AM, "Joel Aldor" <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Alexei,

This is something we're really looking forward to. Thanks a lot!

Regards,

Joel


On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 2:18:20 AM UTC+8, Alexei Peters wrote:

> Hi Vincent,
> Here's the status of dates and the collection of date information in v4.
> As it stands v4.0.0 will only be able to collect date information in the
> few specific formats that you mention above: YYYY-MM-DD, YYYY-MM and YYYY
> If you only want to collect YYYY then you need to remember to set the
> format in the Card Designer (see attached screen shot).  I've verified that
> this will not add -01-01 to the date saved.
> As for the backend validation, we will try to sync that up before the
> release of v4.
>
> In the very near future(next couple of months) we will be addressing the
> "fuzzy date" issue so that users can collect anything that relates to a
> point or range of time and that won't force users to enter specific
> formats.  Eg: you could just specify the string  '*late third century
> B.C.*'
> Allowing something like this to participate in search will be the real
> trick, but I think it's at least partially achievable!
>
> Hope this helps.
> Cheers,
> Alexei
>
>
> Director of Web Development - Farallon Geographics, Inc. - 971.227.3173
> <(971)%20227-3173>
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Vincent Meijer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alexei,
>>
>> What is the current status of fuzzy dates in Arches 4?
>>
>> I have been looking at the Arches code, and it seems the frontend
>> DatePicker only allows YYYY-MM-DD, YYYY-MM and YYYY (*but no B.C.*).
>> However, in practice the datepicker automatically adds 01-01 when I only
>> enter a year.
>> The backend seems to have it's own date validation: 
>> '-%Y','%Y','%Y-%m-%d','%B-%m-%d','%Y-%m-%d
>> %H:%M:%S'
>>
>> I think being able to specify years only and B.C. years would be a good
>> start for our use case, but this would require that our users translate 
>> '*late
>> third century B.C.*' to something like '*-210*'. Seems sketchy.
>>
>> However, I just started thinking about this and maybe there are better
>> solutions. Thoughts welcome!
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Vincent
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 17:57:30 UTC+2, Angela Labrador wrote:
>>
>>> Good thought, Adam - thanks for the feedback -- and great news that
>>> native support for a broader range of date types will be in version 4!
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 7:28:09 PM UTC-4, Adam Cox wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Angela, this looks good and I appreciate the detailed documentation
>>>> on how to install the extension.
>>>>
>>>> One thought I had is that you could move your validation into a new
>>>> dedicated file, and then leave branch-list.js alone.  I did this in my
>>>> current project, in order to create a centralized location for validation
>>>> functions so I could apply them in any form. I created validation.js
>>>> <https://github.com/mradamcox/afrh/blob/master/afrh/media/js/views/forms/sections/validation.js>,
>>>> and then used it in each form like this
>>>> <https://github.com/mradamcox/afrh/blob/master/afrh/media/js/views/forms/inventory-evaluation.js>
>>>> (see lines 5, 9, and 80).  I have two basic functions in there now, but
>>>> have thought that a simple nodeIsDigit() would be good to add.
>>>>
>>>> I set things up this way because I didn't want to bloat branch-list.js,
>>>> in fact, I don't even need it in my app at all.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, the extension looks useful, and I look forward to giving it a
>>>> try soon.
>>>>
>>>> Adam
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Alexei Peters <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Angela,
>>>>> It's great that you guys were able to extend Arches v3 to support
>>>>> fuzzy dates.  Including fuzzy dates natively has definitely been on our
>>>>> radar and will be included in v4.
>>>>> Thanks for contributing back to the community!
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Alexei
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Director of Web Development - Farallon Geographics, Inc. -
>>>>> 971.227.3173
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Angela Labrador <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Greetings!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While learning how Arches works and testing it out in house, we found
>>>>>> that adding Extended Date/Time Format
>>>>>> <http://www.loc.gov/standards/datetime/pre-submission.html>support
>>>>>> to Arches date fields would possibly benefit users who need to manage a
>>>>>> wider range of dates in their inventory system: dates such as "about 
>>>>>> 1800"
>>>>>> or date ranges such as "1934 - present".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We've developed a validation function that can handle such date
>>>>>> strings while maintaining consistency and basic integrity for search in
>>>>>> Arches. The feature is available to the community at our Github
>>>>>> repository along with more detailed technical documentation
>>>>>> <https://github.com/coherit/edtf-arches-hip> for installing and
>>>>>> testing. Our recent blog article
>>>>>> <http://www.coherit.com/blog/fuzzy-dates-edtf-arches/> provides some
>>>>>> background as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please try it out -- we welcome all contributions and issue reports
>>>>>> at our repo!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hope this helps out some folks,
>>>>>> Angela Labrador, PhD.
>>>>>> Coherit Associates, LLC
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To
>>>>>> unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]. For
>>>>>> more information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/fo
>>>>>> rum/archesproject?hl=en
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Arches Project" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe,
>>>>> send email to [email protected]. For more information,
>>>>> visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Arches Project" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>> -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe,
>> send email to [email protected]. For more information,
>> visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Arches Project" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
-- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe,
send email to [email protected]. For more
information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "Arches Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/
topic/archesproject/ZkBkr2yaUlM/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
-- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, send 
email to [email protected]. For more information, 
visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Arches Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to