Hi Dennis, That makes a lot of sense -- thank you for the explanation! I think I was expecting to see what was in the docs and that I had missed a setting. I now see how it works when it's the first provisional entry vs a subsequent provisional edit (and it does work just as you describe). Sorry to barge into this thread...
All best, Angela On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 6:04:16 PM UTC-5, Dennis Wuthrich wrote: > > Hi Angela, > > From your screen shot, it looks like Arches is working as designed. > Here's what's happening: > > In your example, it looks like the provisional edit shown in your screen > capture is in fact the very first time the Name card for the resource > instance was edited. If you look at the message in the pink banner it says > "This is a new contribution by a provisional editor". In plainer language, > what Arches is trying to say is "this is the first edit of this card, and > its been submitted by a provisional editor". Because this is the first and > ONLY edit for this card, Arches doesn't need to show the information your > are expecting on the right-hand side of the form. > > Think of it this way: when a provisional editor submits a new tile, > there's no way for any one else to see the tile until its been approved. > So there will never be multiple edits to a brand-new tile from a > provisional editor. > > You SHOULD see provisional editors listed on the right side of a card when > provisional editors alter an existing approved tile. > > Hope this helps, > > Dennis > > On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 3:15:18 PM UTC-7, Angela Labrador wrote: >> >> Hi Brendon and Dennis, >> >> We're having a similar issue on a site running version 4.4.1. The >> provisional QA Type search works perfectly. When we click Edit for a >> resource with provisional edits, the provisional edit card icons are >> showing up as gold on the left, and we are getting the pink banner at the >> top of the form. However, we are never shown the information to the right >> of the data entry card that was described above (what looks like what >> should be provided by the provisional-tile-manager template?). >> >> Any ideas? Are we missing something obvious here? Permissions seem in >> order -- creating the resource as a resource editor and reviewing as a >> Resource Reviewer. >> >> Did you ever solve it on your end Brendon? >> >> Thanks, >> Angela >> >> >> >> [image: Capture.PNG] >> >> >> On Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 4:32:30 PM UTC-6, Dennis Wuthrich >> wrote: >>> >>> Brendon, >>> >>> Which version of Arches are you using? This may be a case where the >>> documentation is out of synch with the latest version of Arches. In any >>> case, the latest Arches provisional editing review highlights cards that >>> require review. For each card, all users who have edited the card (and who >>> do not belong to the Resource Reviewer group) are listed on the right side >>> of the data entry card. Just click on each account to review and >>> approve/discard their edits. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Dennis >>> >>> On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 at 3:13:26 PM UTC-8, Brendon Bangert >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear Arches Users, >>>> >>>> Our current dev team is experiencing issues establishing how to >>>> properly work the QA approval process. We currently have managed to get >>>> the >>>> QA type filter to appear on our framework however, we cannot get either of >>>> these shown options to appear anywhere (The photo attached). Bear in mind >>>> this image was taken from the development documents, however, there is no >>>> present procedure for how to go about making both option 3, and >>>> subsequentially option 4 to appear. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Brendon R. Bangert >>>> >>>> [image: Capture.PNG] >>>> >>> -- -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]. For more information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Arches Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/archesproject/76e912f3-bf9f-4529-91b9-91b2bdf070b0%40googlegroups.com.
