Thanks for the input, Jijoe--
Marlon
On 6/14/14, 7:33 PM, Jijoe Vurghese wrote:
I’ve heard of it, but not had a chance to use it yet.
The only caveat I see is
https://github.com/coreos/etcd/blob/master/Documentation/production-ready.md
Hence, a choice of ZK vs. etcd comes down to the following (from
https://github.com/coreos/etcd ):
Do the use cases:
1/ Require to handle use cases that Zookeeper Atomic Broadcast (ZAB) protocol
doesn’t? etcd uses Raft.
2/ Require the acclaimed “1000s of writes/s per instance”…in other words, the
use cases you have in mind may outgrow ZK’s throughput
The advantage of ZK is its longer history in production (and hence, more bugs
worked out of that system). There is a non-trivial value in that.
In other words, tradeoffs, tradeoffs :)
—Jijoe
On Jun 13, 2014, at 12:43 PM, Marlon Pierce <[email protected]> wrote:
Has anyone looked at etcd? It is part of the CoreOS project but seems to
be useable independently. It is an alternative to ZooKeeper.
https://github.com/coreos/etcd
Marlon
