Hi, All.

Can someone with permission to administer GPII repos check the repo
settings for GPII/gpii-handlebars and GPII/gpii-pouchdb?   They show up in
the "CI/CLI" category on snyk, and I can't see any obvious differences
between those and a repo like GPII/gpii-express, which shows up in the
correct category.

Cheers,



Tony



On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Tony Atkins <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thanks, Gio.
>
> During testing, I had initially added my own forks of various gpii-* repos
> to the GPII dashboard.  I have removed as many as I can.  There appears to
> be some kind of delay before deleted projects are actually removed, I will
> check back tomorrow to confirm the last two remaining are gone.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Tony
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Tirloni, Giovanni <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I haven't received any objections to Snyk so I'm proceeding by lazy
>> consensus rules.
>>
>> Snyk has been activated for the GPII repositories.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 04/06/2017 09:49 AM, Tirloni, Giovanni wrote:
>> > Thanks, Tony!
>> >
>> > I've cross-posted this to fluid-work as I believe it'll also be a tool
>> for Fluid.
>> >
>> > Here's my email to fluid-work, the same applies to GPII (re: org
>> creation in Snyk):
>> >
>> > ----
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> >    There was a discussion in the GPII Architecture mailing list that
>> started in Oct 2015 when snyk.io was released and I believe it would
>> beneficial to adopt it for Fluid repositories.
>> >
>> >    Here are the relevant threads:
>> >
>> >      http://lists.gpii.net/pipermail/architecture/2015-November/
>> thread.html
>> >      http://lists.gpii.net/pipermail/architecture/2017-April/
>> thread.html
>> >
>> >    And here's more information about Snyk:
>> >
>> >      https://snyk.io/docs/faqs/
>> >      https://snyk.io/plans
>> >
>> >    I took the liberty of creating a "Fluid Project" organization in
>> Snyk and invited the Fluid Project's GitHub administrators to it (as I
>> don't have permission to add repositories).
>> >
>> >    Enabling Snyk for a repository means:
>> >
>> >      * A WebHook will get added to notify snyk.io of new PR and commits
>> >      * A notification will be added to new PRs to identify if they
>> introduce security vulnerabilities (within snyk's scope)
>> >      * The repository will be constantly monitored for new vulnerability
>> >
>> >    To clarify, Snyk is not a static code analyzer. It simply inspects
>> dependencies that have known vulnerabilities.
>> >
>> >    If there is consensus on adopting this tool, I would like to request
>> that someone with admin privileges to the Fluid Project in GitHub to access
>> Snyk.io and add the repositories.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Giovanni
>> > ----
>> >
>> > On 04/06/2017 04:50 AM, Tony Atkins wrote:
>> >> Hi, Giovanni.
>> >>
>> >> Personally I would be happy to have this for every repo and PR.  Even
>> though many of us regularly run "npm outdated" (or "yarn outdated") and
>> test our work with newer libraries, having a report on known bad versions
>> gives us a consistent "trailing edge".  By that I mean that if we haven't
>> managed to otherwise update our dependencies when snyk identifies a
>> problem, we have a good reason to take a moment and review.
>> >>
>> >> Anyway, +1 from me.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Tony
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Tirloni, Giovanni <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>     Snyk can monitor repositories and test new PRs for vulnerable
>> packages.
>> >>
>> >>     Is there interest in having this tool automatically monitoring our
>> repositories? It's free for open source project.
>> >>
>> >>     https://snyk.io/docs/github
>> >>
>> >>     On 10/29/2015 02:29 PM, Steve Lee wrote:
>> >>     > https://snyk.io/
>> >>     >
>> >>     > Steve Lee
>> >>     > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>> >>     > _______________________________________________
>> >>     > Architecture mailing list
>> >>     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >>     > http://lists.gpii.net/mailman/listinfo/architecture <
>> http://lists.gpii.net/mailman/listinfo/architecture>
>> >>     >
>> >>     >
>> >>     _______________________________________________
>> >>     Architecture mailing list
>> >>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >>     http://lists.gpii.net/mailman/listinfo/architecture <
>> http://lists.gpii.net/mailman/listinfo/architecture>
>> >>
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Architecture mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.gpii.net/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Architecture mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gpii.net/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gpii.net/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to