Just FYI
g Gregg C Vanderheiden [email protected] > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Bill Cox via gnome-accessibility-list > <[email protected]> > Subject: Is there an ATK dev who can answer noob questions? > Date: July 25, 2017 at 6:56:38 PM EDT > To: [email protected] > Resent-From: [email protected] > Reply-To: Bill Cox <[email protected]> > > There is a small effort of part-time a11y contributers within Google and > Opera who would like to hook up Chromium to ATK so it can work with Orca. > Between us, I think we have no experience with ATK. Is there anyone who > would be available to answer our noob questions? > > Here's my first one: This function > <https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/ui/accessibility/platform/atk_util_auralinux.cc?l=139&gs=cpp%253Aatk_util_auralinux_class_init%28_AtkUtilAuraLinuxClass%2B*%29%2540chromium%252F..%252F..%252Fui%252Faccessibility%252Fplatform%252Fatk_util_auralinux.cc%257Cdef&gsn=atk_util_auralinux_class_init&ct=xref_usages> > has this line: > > atk_class->get_root = atk_util_auralinux_get_root; > > However, atk_util_auralinux_get_root is never called, while some other > atk_class functions, like get_toolkit_name, are called. At the moment, in > Debian Stretch running Cinnamon, I see the application "chrome" registered, > but it has no children. IIUC, the chromium code used to present more than > this. Is atk_get_root supposed to be called to get access to the accessible > objects within the application? Any help figuring out what we mucked up > would be appreciated. Just as an added incentive, if you help now, I'll > punish you with lots more noob questions in the future :) > > Thanks, > Bill > _______________________________________________ > gnome-accessibility-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gpii.net/mailman/listinfo/architecture
