Hi, All: As we agreed, I investigated two candidates for handling internationalising strings in Infusion components and wrote up the results in a technology evaluation on the wiki:
https://wiki.gpii.net/w/Technology_Evaluation_-_Internationalising_and_Localising_UI_strings I hope to discuss this at the next architecture meeting and/or PCP meeting depending on the level of interest. Please review and comment. Cheers, Tony On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Tony Atkins <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, All: > > Just to follow up, in yesterday's PCP meeting, we agreed that I would > create a simple demonstration of the top candidates in the Technology > Evaluation shared earlier. In starting work on this today, I realised that > although "counterpart" claimed browser support, they meant via browserify > <http://browserify.org>, which I missed in my initial review. IMO that > adds enough complexity to take them off the short list of candidates. I > will proceed to flesh out a demo comparing the following: > > 1. Infusion > 2. i18next <https://github.com/i18next/i18next> > 3. intl.js <http://github.com/andyearnshaw/Intl.js> > > I plan to write something up next week for us to review on the list, and > in the next PCP meeting. > > Cheers, > > Tony > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Tony Atkins <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, All: >> >> As part of the discussions around the PCP API, we have had a few side >> discussions about how best to support internationalisation, specifically >> displaying different strings in the UI depending on the user's preferred >> language. >> >> In the JIRA ticket <https://issues.gpii.net/browse/GPII-2444> related to >> adding i18n support to gpii-handlebars, Steve asked that we look around for >> existing approaches. With that in mind, I took a few minutes today to >> review as many options as I could find, and wrote a new Technology >> Evaluation on the wiki >> <https://wiki.gpii.net/w/Technology_Evaluation_-_Internationalising_and_Localising_UI_strings> >> . >> >> I would like to discuss the list at least briefly in tonight's PCP >> meeting, but whether or not you're attending, you are more than welcome to >> review and comment. I want to confirm that we have good set of >> requirements and candidates to evaluate before proceeding further. Thanks >> in advance for your help. >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> Tony >> > >
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gpii.net/mailman/listinfo/architecture
