Oops, hit the "fire" button. It should have said this:
jqUnit.asynTest("asd", function () {
testThing({
jqUnit: jqUnit,
test: "Test1"
})
});
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Steve Grundell <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Let me explain my thinking, in code..
>
> c#:
>
> public something Invoke(dynamic args) {
>
> args.jqUnit.assert("hello");
>
> try {
>
> this.GetType().GetMEthod(args.test).Invoke(this, input);
>
> } catch (Exception e) {
>
> jqUnit.fail(e.toString());
>
> }
>
> }
>
> public void Test1() {
>
> // the test
>
> TheClass tc = new TheClass();
> int result = tc.ReturnOne();
>
> jqUnit.assertEquals("hi", 1, result);
>
> }
>
> node:
>
> var testThing = // the edge function
> jqUnit.asynTest("asd", function () {
>
> testThing({
>
> })
>
> })
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Joseph Scheuhammer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2017-11-15 7:30 AM, Steve Grundell wrote:
>> > ...
>> >
>> > But, why use a test framework for .NET at all - when you're already
>> > inside jqUnit?
>> >
>> > Each jqUnit test can be a wrapper to call the C# test, and the jqUnit
>> > object can be passed into C# at the start, so you can still do
>> > jqUnit.assert.
>>
>> Thanks Steve.
>>
>> That's the technique used with our Linux code where I previously wrote
>> that only the exported or interface functions from the C++ add-on are
>> tested. The way that is done is by calling the JavaScript version of
>> the exported function code from within jqUnit, and then using assertX()
>> on the return value. That matches exactly what you are proposing.
>>
>> A worry is when things go south inside the native code (C++/Linux, or
>> C#/Windows). That happened with the Windows processes bridge where an
>> IllegalArgumentException was thrown from within the C# code. When that
>> happens, no result is coming back to jqUnit. How does one test for that
>> using jqUnit?
>>
>> Or, those exceptions should be handled within the native code such that
>> a result always comes back. I think. Hmmm... What about functions
>> that don't return anything? Is that an issue?
>>
>> --
>> ;;;;joseph.
>>
>> 'Call me hobophobic, but I don't think two vagrants should be allowed to
>> marry.'
>> - J. Tiedrich -
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gpii.net/mailman/listinfo/architecture
