Hi, All. As discussed, I reassigned all of Kasper's open GPII tickets to Javi and updated the component settings so that issues are assigned to Javi by default.
Cheers, Tony On 23 March 2018 at 10:53, Tony Atkins <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Javi: > > In many cases Kasper is the default because someone selected "Project > default" as the component lead. IMO we should fix the project and then > clean up any stragglers. I am fine with setting you up as the project lead > and reporting back, which I can take care of. > > I will leave it until Monday in case there are other thoughts (I doubt > Kasper will rush in to work on 100+ tickets over the weekend if we leave > them assigned to him). > > Cheers, > > > Tony > > On 22 March 2018 at 18:04, Javier Hernandez <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Tony, >> >> thanks for your heads-up :) >> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 1:16 PM, Tony Atkins <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, All. >>> >>> In working on issues.gpii.net earlier today I noticed that the departed >>> Kasper is the default assignee for the GPII project on our JIRA instance. >>> I did a quick review, there are 178 open issues still assigned to Kasper >>> <https://issues.gpii.net/issues/?jql=assignee%3Dkasper%20and%20resolution%20is%20empty> >>> . >>> >>> So, first question, who should be the default assignee for the GPII >>> project? >>> >> >> We have the ability to have a different default assignee for different >> components, see https://issues.gpii.net/projects/GPII?selectedItem=com. >> atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:components-page >> >> Then I guess that first we need to review the default assignee for every >> component in that list, and also, to update those where Kasper is the >> default one. >> >> WRT the default assignee for the GPII project, I can be the default >> assignee so I can re-assign/update as I receive them. If you all are okay >> with this, I can ask Alfredo to update it in JIRA ASAP. >> >> >>> Second question, which (if any) of these is Kasper still working on? >>> >> >> I guess that Antranig may have an idea of this, but I'm not completely >> sure. >> >> >>> >>> >> Who should the rest be assigned to? >>> >> >> >>> >>> We can discuss at the next meeting, but I thought I'd ask in case there >>> was already an agreed plan. >>> >> >> >> Yes, we must definitely go through all these tickets and update the >> default assignees of the components, and yes, we should use our next arch >> meeting to do that. >> >> Cheers, >> Javi >> >> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> >>> Tony >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Architecture mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.gpii.net/mailman/listinfo/architecture >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gpii.net/mailman/listinfo/architecture
