Should we be following and contributing to these? So that they will work with Morphic?
g > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Michael Cooper <[email protected]> > Subject: Labels for personalization semantics issues > Date: June 18, 2018 at 1:55:18 PM EDT > To: Personalization TF <[email protected]> > Resent-From: [email protected] > > I set up a few new labels for personalization semantics issues: > > features - Features that should be supported by personalization semantics - > https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/labels/features > <https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/labels/features> > implementation - Approaches to add personalization semantics to content - > https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/labels/implementation > <https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/labels/implementation> > structure - Ways to structure the vocabulary that impact its features - > https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/labels/structure > <https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/labels/structure> > I labeled some of the existing issues with these labels, but was using hasty > judgement about which ones matched. Feel free to adjust the labels. I didn't > try to tackle all the issues. We might need additional labels, there three > were just ones that came up in today's call as ones we need. Issues can have > more than one label. > > Michael
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gpii.net/mailman/listinfo/architecture
