On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Supun Malinga <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi All, > > We are in the process of giving J2EE support with AS. Here for integrating > EJB 3.1 we have option to support EJB 3.1 Lite version only. Though that > would suffice for having J2EE webprofile support, EJB Lite lacks few > features from EJB full, refer [1]. > For this I think we should go for EJB 3.1 full support, since some of the > missing features from EJB Lite is useful. > > Thoughts?. > In AS roadmap still we don't have a plan to support complete J2EE spec our immediate goal is to support J2EE-Web Profile where only EJB-Lite is required. In my POV time to market factor is much important here IMHO first let's support for EJB-Lite and J2EE-WP after that we can decide whether we have real requirement to support full EJB spec and full J2EE spec. Please note that supporting to each standalone spec involved integrating testing with Carbon features and others specs etc. Thanks ! > > [1] > http://www.devx.com/supportitems/showSupportItem.php?co=42351&supportitem=figure4 > > thanks, > -- > Supun Malinga, > > Software Engineer, > WSO2 Inc. > http://wso2.com > http://wso2.org > email - [email protected] <[email protected]> > mobile - 071 56 91 321 > > _______________________________________________ > Architecture mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture > > -- Sagara Gunathunga Technical Lead; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com V.P Apache Web Services; http://ws.apache.org/ Linkedin; http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara Blog ; http://ssagara.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
