--Pradeep
sent from my phone
On Jun 24, 2013 11:25 PM, "Pushpalanka Jayawardhana" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Following is how we are to use dep-sync to sync user store configurations
across clusters, with some inputs from Charitha, Prabath and Pradeep.
> repository/conf/userstores/user-mgt.xml - configuration of super admin
> repositoty/conf/userstores/tenants/1/user-mgt.xml - configuration for
tenant with tenant-id: 1
> repositoty/conf/userstores/tenants/2/user-mgt.xml - configuration for
tenant with tenant-id: 2    likewise

Is it possible to have the tenant directory structure independent from the
user store directory. In the future there will be few config files with
similar requirements I believe...

> This is similar to the structure used in deploying artifacts at
repository/tenants/1/ for tenants, as currently existing.
> So we already have two folders synced with dep-sync in a product. One at
repositoy/deployment/server/ and one at repository/tenants/.
> We are to add one more folder to be synced with dep-sync at
repository/conf/userstores/
>
> Correct me, if I have got anything wrong. Glad to know any concerns or
thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Pushpalanka Jayawardhana
>
> Software Engineer
>
> WSO2 Lanka (pvt) Ltd
>
>
> Mobile: +94779716248
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Prabath Siriwardena <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>
>> I guess dep sync based approach will solve these...
>>
>> Thanks & regards,
>> -Prabath
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Srinath Perera <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Azeez and myself was chatting, and following are some of the
conflicting requirements.
>>>
>>> 1. like to edit configs from file system, and via UI avoiding two
copies if possible (have to avoid case where we edit file, then we edit via
UI where we lost the file updates).
>>> 2. Need a way to sync configs across the cluster
>>> 3. Make the sync model clear and consistent for both configs and
artifacts (currently we use dep-sync only with artifacts)
>>> 4. Like to sync only one folder in the product with dep-sync
>>> 5. We should not do product folder structure before major release (C5?)
>>>
>>> We need to find the best solution out of that.
>>>
>>>
>>> --Srinath
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Senaka Fernando <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Srinath,
>>>>
>>>> IMHO, relying on a dep-sync-based model sounds appropriate here. We
can have several strategies for dep-sync (i.e. registry, svn, manual etc),
but the server will be driven by what's on the filesystem. IMHO, that's
very straightforward.
>>>>
>>>> And, I think we need to first of all figure out what and what's going
to be sync'ed and what's not. When it comes to some configuration files it
might make sense to sync portions and keep some static. In that case, do we
need to split those files in two? Also, we need to focus on the "things
that change across environments and things that don't" for the sever
configuration as in the "CAR-based Governance Story" for ESB configurations.
>>>>
>>>> Also, the dep-sync's notification model should work like the
hierarchical cache invalidation model that Azeez proposed, making sure that
things will scale.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Senaka.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Jeewantha Dharmaparakrama <
[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Srinath,
>>>>>
>>>>> If the node which detects the change in its config file redeploys the
config in every other node explicitly, we can ensure that every node sees
the change since there will always be one node which is responsible in
informing the others. I guess thats what depsync does IINM.
>>>>>
>>>>> If the config is stored in a central place, every node will have to
pull the change from that place. Here if one node fails to redeploy the
change, other nodes will be unaware about it so that the system will be
unstable.  IMHO we should prefer the former.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeewantha
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Srinath Perera <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We just finished a review on UI for user stores and figured we are
doing this in several ways. Pradeep, Prabath, and myself had a chat, and
following are our thoughts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have different types of configurations with carbon server
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) Some are only apply for one node (e.g. carbon.xml, registry.xml
..)
>>>>>> 2) Some might be useful across a cluster, but we ask users to copy
it to all the nodes (e.g. data sources, xacml policies, keystores ?? )
>>>>>> 3) It is proposed that we will automatically replicate user-store
configurations using deployment synchronizer when it is added to one node.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To share the same configurations across all nodes in the cluster, we
have several options.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) We can have a config files, and use deployment sync to sync them
across the cluster (Then, I think we need to have a cluster folder in conf
or make clear what configurations are replicated).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2) We have a config file, but once read, we store them in a DB or in
registry, since all nodes share same DB/ registry there is no need to
replication (we can send a cluster message saying there is a update). Risk
of this is after bring edited by UI and directly via the file, two sources
might go out of sync and some updates can be lost when next update happend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3) Data sources can be added via UI (goes to registry) or via file
system (not replicated), which is a mix.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we need to stick to one model out of #1 and #2. We thought
dep sync model is the best as it is clear. But then we have to tell which
part of the configs get replicated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Srinath
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> ============================
>>>>>> Srinath Perera, Ph.D.
>>>>>>   Senior Software Architect, WSO2 Inc.
>>>>>>   Visiting Faculty, University of Moratuwa
>>>>>>   Member, Apache Software Foundation
>>>>>>   Research Scientist, Lanka Software Foundation
>>>>>>   Blog: http://srinathsview.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>   Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/hemapani/
>>>>>>  Phone: 0772360902
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jeewantha Dharmaparakrama
>>>>> Software Engineer; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com/
>>>>> Phone : (+94) 774726790
>>>>> Skype : prasad.jeewantha
>>>>> LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeewanthad
>>>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/jeewamp
>>>>> Blog: http://jeewanthad.blogspot.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Senaka Fernando
>>>> Member - Integration Technologies Management Committee;
>>>> Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>>>
>>>> E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com
>>>> P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736; M: +94 77 322 1818
>>>> Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>>>
>>>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ============================
>>> Srinath Perera, Ph.D.
>>>   Director, Research, WSO2 Inc.
>>>
>>>   Visiting Faculty, University of Moratuwa
>>>   Member, Apache Software Foundation
>>>   Research Scientist, Lanka Software Foundation
>>>   Blog: http://srinathsview.blogspot.com/
>>>   Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/hemapani/
>>>  Phone: 0772360902
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Architecture mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Prabath
>>
>> Mobile : +94 71 809 6732
>>
>> http://blog.facilelogin.com
>> http://RampartFAQ.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Architecture mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to