On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Shiroshica Kulatilake <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Apparently having to find a way to make non multi-tenanted products to
> work in a multi-tenanted environment is a situation that has been come
> across before.
>
> IBM has had to do this and there are multi-tenanting 
> patterns<http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/cloud/library/cl-tenantconversion/>that
>  can be followed.
>
> Some of these methods are having a shared user store and operational
> database thus achieving the shared database model; having tenant specific
> reports and logs etc..
>
> What we are doing in appfactory for each of the ecosystems may already
> fall into one of these patterns. For those cases where we are still looking
> for a solution, viewing the problem from this aspect might shed some light.
> The different models of multi-tenancy and through that seeing which level
> can be shared within a given non MT'd tool is also a point to consider.
> Through this we may have a label to how we multi-tenanted products X, Y and
> Z.
>

GitBlit - Shared Application
Jenkins - Shred Middleware(according to the article) - But I would call it
multi-tenancy coming from the PaaS


thanks,
dimuthu


> WDYT ?
>
> Thank you,
> Shiro
> nkins slaves [4][5]. We need to figure out a scheme on how to do this.
>
>
>
> --
> Shiroshica Kulatilake
>
> Architect,
> WSO2, Inc. http://wso2.com/
> Phone: +94 776523867
>
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>
>


-- 
Dimuthu Leelarathne
Architect & Product Lead of App Factory

WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
email: [email protected]
Mobile : 0773661935

Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to