Hi, I also believe the 1st approach is best to proceed. Then we have some consistency throughout the product.
Regards, Gihan On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Ayashkantha Ramasinghe <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi, > > The "BAM car file deployer" is created to deploy toolboxes in the server > as a cApp. I have two approaches, > > 1. to copy the toolbox to bam-toolbox directly and let the toolbox > deployer run automatically and deploy the toolbox. > 2. to deploy the toolbox using the code while deploying cApp without > copying the toolbox to bam-toolbox directory directly. > > In 1st approach, we can go and manually see the toolbox deployed inside > the directory, bam-toolbox. But, in the 2nd approach, we can't see or > undeploy it manually, only cApp undeployment does the undeployment of the > toolbox. > > I am also thinking that the 1st approach is good, but, for now, the > deployer is created based on the 2nd approach. > > WDYT??? > > Thank you > > -- > Ayashkantha Ramasinghe > Software Engineer > > Tel: +94 777 487 669 > -- --- W.G. Gihan Anuruddha Senior Software Engineer | WSO2, Inc. M: +94772272595
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
