On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Asela Pathberiya <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Venura Kahawala <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are in the process of moving the below UI features out from the IS
>> management console.
>>
>> 1. My Profiles
>> 2. Account Recovery
>> 3. My Authorized apps
>> 4. OpenID
>> 5. My SCIM Providers
>> 6. Multifactor Authentication
>> 7. Sign-up
>>
>
> 8. Password change by user
>
>
>>
>>
>> A jaggery application will be implemented with the above mentioned
>> features and deployed within IS server. This application can be accessed
>> via a different port. High level architecture diagram can be seen here [1].
>>
>> Jaggery application will be implemented ad-hearing to the caramel
>> framework.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://docs.google.com/a/wso2.com/drawings/d/1jQsKbSVnH3cHCKkNjaLqr9cBARk0pD04RLPGgid4R7M/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> Please share your thoughts.
>>
>
> +1 for having this without OSGI...  It is better to use web services as
> you have mentioned.
>
> Also, is there any special reason for using Jaggery?  Because , i see that
> web app that you are developing would not be much portable. Actually in a
> practical situation, i may have already developed web application that is
> running on an app server. Then i need to enable some identity management
> features (account recovery, change password, signup) in to my exiting web
> app. Therefore i would add presentation pages for this using exiting
> presentation layer. So i would look for some client side library to call
> these web service APIs of Identity Server (I would not look for already
> developed Jaggery app).  I guess,  it is to better to have some kind of
> client side sample library where we could use to develop my presentation
> pages. If we can write this Jaggery web application using kind of client
> side APIs, that would be fine.  If not, I do not think there is much worth
> of this for the developers who are using Identity Server's APIs.  However
> it would just add some nice UI pages to WSO2 Identity Server. (when it is
> developed in cloud)
>

+1, yes, if you can have a common client library, people can write their
own UIs/pages in jsp / jaggery. by default IS can have a jaggery app, but
should separate the client library, so that it can be reused.

we have done it at [1] and [2] is the common client library

[1] https://github.com/wso2/enterprise-store/tree/master/modules/apps/sso
[2]
https://github.com/wso2/enterprise-store/tree/master/modules/components/sso-common


>
> Thanks,
> Asela.
>
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Venura
>>
>> --
>> Senior Software Engineer
>>
>> Mobile: +94 71 82 300 20
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
> Asela
>
> ATL
> Mobile : +94 777 625 933
>



-- 
*Thanks & Regards,

Nuwan Bandara
Technical Lead; **WSO2 Inc. *
*lean . enterprise . middleware |  http://wso2.com *
*blog : http://nuwanbando.com; email: [email protected]; phone: +94 11 214 5345
*
<http://www.nuwanbando.com/>
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to