+1, Before this, we should work on the registry API's first.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Eranda Sooriyabandara <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi All, > Currently in registry kernel we have three main packages. > > 1. org.wso2.carbon.registry.core - Enables core registry > functionalities > - Registry Service > - Registry Configuration > - Dataaccess > - Caching > - Clustering > - Pagination > 2. org.wso2.carbon.registry.app - Registry ATOM API + ATOM client > (Remote Registry) > 3. org.wso2.carbon.registry.synchronization - Registry Check-in client > utility > > > As we can see org.wso2.carbon.registry.app.* and > org.wso2.carbon.registry.synchronization.* are built on top of core > registry API which is org.wso2.carbon.registry.core.*. Reside them inside > registry kernel is not necessary and AFAIK no other component in kernel > using them. So for the minimum viable registry kernel we can move > org.wso2.carbon.registry.app.* and > org.wso2.carbon.registry.synchronization.* as registry components to the > platform. > > Thoughts? > > thanks > Eranda > > > -- > > *Eranda Sooriyabandara *Senior Software Engineer; > Integration Technologies Team; > WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com > Lean . Enterprise . Middleware > > E-mail: eranda AT wso2.com > Mobile: +94 716 472 816 > Linked-In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/erandasooriyabandara > Blog: http://emsooriyabandara.blogspot.com/ > > > > > -- *Kishanthan Thangarajah* Senior Software Engineer, Platform Technologies Team, WSO2, Inc. lean.enterprise.middleware Mobile - +94773426635 Blog - *http://kishanthan.wordpress.com <http://kishanthan.wordpress.com>* Twitter - *http://twitter.com/kishanthan <http://twitter.com/kishanthan>*
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
