We've implemented the logging functionality in C5 is using Pax logging.
Logging is enabled when the Pax logging bundle is activated.

But I faced two major issues with Pax logging that we need to fix
immediately.

1) Carbon launcher component logs info and debug levels before launching
the OSGi framework. These log messages never make their way to the
wso2carbon.log file. Because the Pax bundle only enables the logging
services once the Pax bundle is activated by the OSGi framework. Therefore
OSGi framework has to be up and running to get the logging functionality
working, otherwise we loose all log messages logged before the OSGi
framework starts. [1]

2) OSGi bundles face a similar problem. it is related to the bundle
starting order. There are two sub issues here. (i) If a bundle becomes
active and start logging before the Pax bundle becomes active, then we
again loose those log messages. (ii) OSGi frameworks stops each and every
bundle before deactivating itself. If the Pax bundle is stopped, then
logging service becomes unavailable. Say a bundle wants to log during the
server stop and if the Pax bundle is stopped before this bundle, we loose
all the logs messages. [2]

If we are going ahead with Pax, then we need to solve these problems ASAP.


Thanks,
Sameera.

[1] CARBON-14612 - Logging component does not capture the logs messages
logged before Carbon launcher starts OSGi
framework<https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-14612>
[2] CARBON-14613 - Log messages are lost if they ares logged before the Pax
bundle is started. <https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-14613>



On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote:

> I would suggest going with PAX logging,
>
> Azeez
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Kishanthan Thangarajah <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'm bringing up this thread to discuss on the logging backend and logging
>> framework in C5.
>>
>>  Our current logging framework uses log4j as the logging backend and
>> support a set of logging APIs (commons-logging, slf4j, java-logging, log4j
>> logger). We currently don't support OSGI LogService. But we need to decide
>> on whether do we need to support this as there were some decision made
>> earlier not to support?
>>
>> This framework is serving well so far, but if we have to support other
>> logging APIs then we will have to write them.
>>
>> *Alternatives*
>> 1. Log4j2 [1] (logging backend only)
>> The next generation of log4j. It is still at the beta stage in release.
>> This looks promising as the numbers of this is way ahead of its predecessor
>> [2].
>>
>> 2. Pax logging [3] (complete framework)
>> This framework uses a similar concept as ours. It uses log4j as the
>> backend and support a whole set of logging APIs such as commons-logging
>> API, log4J-logger API, jdk-logging, avalon-logger API, knopflerfish-log and
>> tomcat-juli. It also has support for OSGI LogService API.
>>
>> So far we found that Pax logging has the support for all required logging
>> APIs including the support for OSGI LogService.
>>
>> Other projects mostly have written their own way to handle different
>> logging APIs like ours.
>>
>> Thoughts and ideas are welcome !
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kishanthan.
>> [1] http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/
>>  [2]
>> http://www.javacodegeeks.com/2013/07/log4j-2-performance-close-to-insane.html
>> [3] https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/display/paxlogging/Pax+Logging
>>
>> --
>> *Kishanthan Thangarajah*
>> Senior Software Engineer,
>> Platform Technologies Team,
>> WSO2, Inc.
>> lean.enterprise.middleware
>>
>> Mobile - +94773426635
>> Blog - *http://kishanthan.wordpress.com
>> <http://kishanthan.wordpress.com>*
>> Twitter - *http://twitter.com/kishanthan <http://twitter.com/kishanthan>*
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Afkham Azeez*
> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
> * <http://www.apache.org/>*
> *email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>
> * cell: +94 77 3320919 <%2B94%2077%203320919> blog: *
> *http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>
> *twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
> * linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez
> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez>*
>
> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
>



-- 
Sameera Jayasoma,
Architect,

WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
email: [email protected]
blog: http://sameera.adahas.org
twitter: https://twitter.com/sameerajayasoma
flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sameera-jayasoma/collections
Mobile: 0094776364456

Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to