On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Eranda Sooriyabandara <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi All, > We were thought of moving event component to the carbon kernel because of > most of the projects are using it and we don't want to release all the MB > related components when we releasing other products. > I finish moving it to the carbon-utils and find out that the following > dependency structure is there. > > event- > |----- remote-usermgt > | |------user-manager > | |-------userstore-config > |------ org.wso2.carbon.qpid.stub > > So I have to move the dependent components to the carbon-utils too. As I > see moving these (components, features, service stubs) to carbon-utils does > not feel much wrong since it is self contained. Since we are planning to > remove qpid I just use the stub dependency instead moving all qpid to the > carbon-utils. > > WDYT? > + 1 what ever the reason you should not move Qpid or Andes into any carbon-* project those should be threat as external projects such as axiom/axis2/Jaggery. Thanks ! > > Please refer the repo in [1]. > > thanks > Eranda > > [1]. https://github.com/wso2/carbon-utils > > -- > > *Eranda Sooriyabandara*Senior Software Engineer; > Integration Technologies Team; > WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com > Lean . Enterprise . Middleware > > E-mail: eranda AT wso2.com > Mobile: +94 716 472 816 > Linked-In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/erandasooriyabandara > Blog: http://emsooriyabandara.blogspot.com/ > > > > > -- Sagara Gunathunga Senior Technical Lead; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com V.P Apache Web Services; http://ws.apache.org/ Linkedin; http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara Blog ; http://ssagara.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
