+1.  Yep is what I meant.

Thanks,
Manoj


On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Anjana Fernando <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> Yeah, the existing data source component does exactly that. When you
> mention a data source in a *-datasources.xml file, you can make it
> available as JNDI resource, that is what the following section of a data
> source configuration does:
>
> <jndiConfig>
>     <name>{RES_NAME}</name>
>     <!-- optional properties -->
>     <environment>
>         <property name="java.naming.factory.initial">{ICS}</property>
>         <property name="java.naming.provider.url">{PROVIDER_URL}</property>
>     </environment>
> </jndiConfig>
>
> And as Senaka mentioned, this is how registry and user-manager looks up
> its data sources when the server is starting up. Hope this is what Manoj is
> looking for.
>
> Cheers,
> Anjana.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:00 AM, Senaka Fernando <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Manoj,
>>
>> Please find the responses inline.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Manoj Fernando <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Senaka,
>>>
>>> What I meant was the scenario of me as an outside developer wanting to
>>> add a new datasource for my own carbon component.  Right now, just adding
>>> the datasource into the xml doesn't make it available as a JNDI resource.
>>>  You need to do that extra step of reading the XML and attaching that onto
>>> the InitialContext (AFAIK).  It would be much nicer IMO to have those
>>> datasources added into the initialcontext during bootstrap so that whatever
>>> component needing to use any of them can simply use the JNDI key to
>>> reference.
>>>
>>
>> IINM, you should not be doing this. The JNDI referencing should work from
>> any component, webapp etc. We have done nothing special @ the registry
>> kernel for instance and if the JNDI referencing works in there it should
>> work elsewhere too. Copied Anjana to get this clarified.
>>
>>>
>>> The convenience on system properties would be similar.  We can have a
>>> config file under repository conf that will get automatically loaded as
>>> system properties for any component that might need them.  Yes I know we
>>> can pass them as startup parameters, but it was basically a suggestion for
>>> sysadmin/developer convenience.  Nothing major... but just for convenience.
>>>
>>
>> IMHO, it can be a convinience with regards to some use-cases and an
>> inconvinience with regards to some others. I think we need to consider the
>> pros and cons. There are things like clustering, environment-separation,
>> which overrides what (i.e. JAVA_OPTS vs this file) etc that we need to
>> think about. Will add some points later.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Manoj
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Senaka Fernando <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Manoj,
>>>>
>>>> Datasources can be referenced by JNDI key even now. This is how it
>>>> works in Registry Kernel and UM. Is it done in some other way in carbon
>>>> components?
>>>>
>>>> And, for system properties, you can pass these through the
>>>> wso2server.sh/bat. I see no benefit of having a separate component to
>>>> do just that. Am I missing something here?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Senaka.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Manoj Fernando <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> My thoughts were basically on the scenario of which a developer
>>>>> (perhaps a client) may want to develop a new carbon component (for 
>>>>> example)
>>>>> and use a separate datasource for persistence.  If we can pre-load ALL
>>>>> datasources into an initial context, we will not have to write the context
>>>>> initialization code outside that component IMO.  We can simply reference
>>>>> the JNDI without having to modify any datasource init code.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think same applies for loading system properties.  If we have a
>>>>> carbon component which will pre-load all application specific system
>>>>> properties, a component developer will just have to reference it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Manoj
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Sumedha Rubasinghe 
>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We allow defining data sources @ two levels targeting two different
>>>>>> audiences.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Type1:
>>>>>> Data sources defined in master-datasources.xml are used for server's
>>>>>> internal storage requirements. This includes data source definitions like
>>>>>> Registry database, User Store, etc. These data sources are modified by
>>>>>> developers working on components for Carbon Servers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Type2:
>>>>>> Then we also have data source defining capabilities for developers
>>>>>> who will be using Carbon platform to write applications. This 
>>>>>> capabilities
>>>>>> are exposed by WSO2 RSS (Relational Storage Server) & WSO2 AF.
>>>>>> These data sources are dynamically loaded.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I feel it's acceptable for Type1 not to be loaded dynamically &
>>>>>> Type2 to be loaded dynamically.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Manoj Fernando <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Was wondering if it makes sense to dynamically load ALL datasources
>>>>>>> defined in master-datasources.xml during bootstrap (well... we could
>>>>>>> perhaps build an enable/disable switch on the config).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Will be a useful feature when we may want to segregate various
>>>>>>> elements that need to be persisted at different stores.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Manoj
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Manoj Fernando
>>>>>>> Director - Solutions Architecture
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Contact:
>>>>>>> LK -  +94 112 145345
>>>>>>> Mob: +94 773 759340
>>>>>>> www.wso2.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> /sumedha
>>>>>> b :  bit.ly/sumedha
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Manoj Fernando
>>>>> Director - Solutions Architecture
>>>>>
>>>>> Contact:
>>>>> LK -  +94 112 145345
>>>>> Mob: +94 773 759340
>>>>> www.wso2.com
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *[image: http://wso2.com] <http://wso2.com> Senaka Fernando*
>>>> Senior Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>>> <http://apache.org>E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com <http://wso2.com>**P: +1
>>>> 408 754 7388 <%2B1%20408%20754%207388>; ext: 51736*;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *M: +94 77 322 1818 <%2B94%2077%20322%201818> Linked-In:
>>>> http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>>> <http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando>*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Manoj Fernando
>>> Director - Solutions Architecture
>>>
>>> Contact:
>>> LK -  +94 112 145345
>>> Mob: +94 773 759340
>>> www.wso2.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Architecture mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> *[image: http://wso2.com] <http://wso2.com> Senaka Fernando*
>> Senior Technical Lead; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>
>>
>>
>> * Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>> <http://apache.org>E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com <http://wso2.com>**P: +1
>> 408 754 7388 <%2B1%20408%20754%207388>; ext: 51736*;
>>
>>
>> *M: +94 77 322 1818 <%2B94%2077%20322%201818> Linked-In:
>> http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>> <http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando>*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Anjana Fernando*
> Technical Lead
> WSO2 Inc. | http://wso2.com
> lean . enterprise . middleware
>



-- 
Manoj Fernando
Director - Solutions Architecture

Contact:
LK -  +94 112 145345
Mob: +94 773 759340
www.wso2.com
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to