Hey guys,

So I was a bit mistaken before when I said this was a small API, cause
I was looking at the Youtube ANALYTICS api, which only has one
function that returns a report about usage.  The actual mainline
Youtube api is HUGE, with all these functions for manipulating
playlists and subscriptions and channels and everything else.  So
Malaka is right that this could take long, especially if I'm going to
take an actual Youtube account and test every one of these functions.
Now that's fine, I don't mind doing a big api, but this could take a
while.

I'm just about done coding the very first version of the connector,
which just has the minimum functionality for each part.  I'll  keep
you guys posted about what happens next.

jc

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Nuwan Bandara <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Hows the connector dev work progressing ?
>
> Regards,
> /Nuwan
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Jason Catlin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> As you know, the ESB has the ability to use connector plugins so that
>> you can easily make calls to common services without having to
>> re-implement the details.  We want a rich library of these, and I'll
>> be contributing a few.  I'll be starting with a youtube connector,
>> something relativley simple, and then doing more complicated ones
>> later.
>>
>> So I looked through all the connectors already implemented and
>> determined that the twitter connector is probably the most similar to
>> what I'll be doing.  The authentication is very similar, and then both
>> just have a few simple queries made through REST interfaces.
>>
>> A few points of interest:  Even though the ESB Connector system has a
>> way to specify REST connectors, the twitter connector doesn't use
>> this, and rather uses a Java coded one instead.  Does anyone know what
>> the reason for this is?
>>
>> Also, I noticed that the twitter connector forms an OAuth token inside
>> the Java code, and it gets its authentication details from properties
>> that it reads form the configuration of the connector.  This is one
>> way to do it.  Another way, which might make more sense to me, is for
>> the connector to ignore the OAuth all together, and have the user add
>> that header outside the connector.  This might give them much more
>> control over it.  Does anyone know why they set up the twitter
>> connector that way?
>>
>> In general, I think this will probably be a pretty open and shut
>> project.  I'd be suprised if it takes more than a week.
>>
>> JC
>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Nuwan Bandara | Senior Technical Lead - Solutions Architecture,  WSO2 Inc.
> +1 812.606.7390 | +1 650.745.4499 Ext 4210 | http://nuwanbando.com
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to