copied to Architecture mailing list
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe <[email protected]> wrote: > Why is this thread private? > > Thanks, > Samisa... > > > Samisa Abeysinghe > > Vice President Delivery > > WSO2 Inc. > http://wso2.com > > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Pubudu Dissanayake <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> The idea behind this email is to describe Pros/Cons of Carbon UI >> framework if we decide not to make this part of kernel. based on the >> previous discussion regarding C5 UI framework, Internal research has been >> conducted regarding usage of management console UI of each product. >> >> Mgt Console UI usage - >> https://docs.google.com/a/wso2.com/document/d/1o73UcdmiGgTURnpasVuJ6ekslQGlttXdywKaJYh-Dz0/edit >> >> Following Pros/Cons were extracted according to the research results. >> Here are some facts , >> >> Pros >> >> - Light weight kernel ( without UI framework ) >> >> Cons >> >> - At the moment ( Carbon 4.2.0 ) following functionalities shipped >> with admin UI >> - Deploying an artifact ( Development stuffs are removed from >> admin UI) >> - Seeing the statistics ( Service stats and system stats) >> - User, role , permission management >> - Registry UI related components >> - WSO2 MB is heavily coupled with admin UI >> >> >> It would be better if we can discuss these things and finalize decision >> whether we need the management console (and hence framework), WDYT ? >> >> >> -- >> *Pubudu Dissanayake* >> Software Engineer >> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com >> lean.enterprise.middleware >> Mobile: 0775503304 >> > > -- *Pubudu Dissanayake* Software Engineer WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com lean.enterprise.middleware Mobile: 0775503304
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
