Hi Cyril, There's no specific issue in having Cassandra as a message store, from 3.0.0 v on our intention is to allow the user with a more generic option of choosing the most desired data store, instead of having he/she restricted to a specific.
Thanks, Pamod On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Cyril Rognon <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > +1 on making Cassandra an option rather than a dependancy. > > Could we know if there is some issue with using Cassandra as a message > store ? > > Thanks > Cyril > Le 21 oct. 2014 08:31, "Akalanka Pagoda Arachchi" <[email protected]> a > écrit : > >> Hi all, >> >> We have decided remove Cassandra profile from Message Broker 3.0.0 since >> Cassandra will be an optional requirement from MB 3.0.0 onwards. >> >> WDYT? >> >> *Thanks & Regards,* >> *Akalanka Pagoda Arachchi,* >> *Software Engineer* >> *078-4721791 <078-4721791>* >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Architecture mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Architecture mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture > > -- *Pamod Sylvester * *Senior Software Engineer * Integration Technologies Team, WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com email: [email protected] cell: +94 77 7779495
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
