Hi Chathura, Can you also list down the pros and cons of each option?
Thanks > On Apr 16, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Sameera Jayasoma <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Chathura, > > Lets do a native upgrade. > > Thanks, > Sameera. > >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Chathura Priyankara <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> I'm currently working on migrating the Carbon platform to log4j 2.2 from >> 1.2.17. >> There are two ways of upgrading log4j version as follows. >> >> 1. Using the Log4j 1.2 bridge. >> 2. Native upgrade >> >> With the first option we cannot use Appenders. >> As we need Appender support I decided to select the second option. >> >> Appreciate any feedback about this approach. >> >> Thanks! >> Chathura. >> >> -- >> Chathura Priyankara >> Software Engineer | WSO2 Inc. >> Mobile : +94718795340 >> Blog : www.codeoncloud.blogspot.com > > > > -- > Sameera Jayasoma, > Software Architect, > > WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com) > email: [email protected] > blog: http://blog.sameera.org > twitter: https://twitter.com/sameerajayasoma > flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sameera-jayasoma/collections > Mobile: 0094776364456 > > Lean . Enterprise . Middleware >
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
