Hi Srinath,

Thanks for the reply. Yes, the original question was to discuss whether we
should use the originally expected query as is or to define a simpler
syntax and create the complex query that is expected by the attribute
search service internally. Given a query country=usa, we can internally
look for both attributes and properties. But how would someone search for
tags and comments? In that case, should the user be sending the query
tags=<tag value> and comment=<Comment>?

@Isuruwan : Currently we can't use the search with & of two properties even
with the map as it's obvious that there can be only one key (say propertyName)
in a map.
@Nuwan : The values can be checked for both. In that case the
rightPropertyValue=usa
OR lk

@Anjana : Currently, our search service internally builds the solr query
and that service expects the complex query as mentioned above. We can solr
query to be passed directly (which again is a discussion on whether we
should allow the user to search all attributes indexed as you have
mentioned). But IMO, it would be best to define a simple query and we build
the expected query internally.

@Sagara/Ruchira/Danesh : Shall we discuss this further f2f?

Shazni Nazeer
Mob : +94 777737331
LinkedIn : http://lk.linkedin.com/in/shazninazeer
Blog : http://shazninazeer.blogspot.com

On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Anjana Fernando <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Yeah, we simply use the Lucene query syntax. There was no reason for us to
> create our own on top of it, because it provides a very powerful syntax to
> query the data. For example, Elastic also use Lucene query language for
> there solution. I'm not sure, for registry if this is suitable or not, as
> in, by giving the full power to the user to query all the attributes
> indexed, and whether some should be filtered/hidden from the end user.
>
> Cheers,
> Anjana.
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Srinath Perera <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Shazni, is backend our code? if so we can fix it. Or we can translate
>> from simpler version to complex version automatically in our code. I also
>> think it should be country=usa.
>>
>> Also, BAM had the same problem and gone with Solr syntax. I am not sure
>> what is the right answer, but pretty use it should be same for both.
>> Sagara, Anjana please talk.
>>
>> --Srinath
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Shazni Nazeer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> @Manuranga - Fair question. But that's the way the search attribute
>>> service in the backend expects. Further, the query I have given is
>>> specifically to query a property in the artifact. So specifying
>>> "country=usa", we should internally find out that it's a property that the
>>> user is querying. And for your concern that "convenient method is not that
>>> convenient", that's what the question is all about; whether to keep the
>>> query as it's or use a different syntax and pass the attribute map to the
>>> search service within the method.
>>>
>>> Shazni Nazeer
>>> Mob : +94 777737331
>>> LinkedIn : http://lk.linkedin.com/in/shazninazeer
>>> Blog : http://shazninazeer.blogspot.com
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Manuranga Perera <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> That convenient method is not that convenient.
>>>>
>>>> Why
>>>> "propertyName=country&rightOp=eq&rightPropertyValue=usa"
>>>> Instead
>>>> "country=usa"
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Architecture mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ============================
>> Srinath Perera, Ph.D.
>>    http://people.apache.org/~hemapani/
>>    http://srinathsview.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Anjana Fernando*
> Senior Technical Lead
> WSO2 Inc. | http://wso2.com
> lean . enterprise . middleware
>
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>
>
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to