Hi All, We thought of using "request_batch" as the reserved operation name and "enableRequestBatch" as the parameter in dbs, But this may confuse end users as we already have "enableBatchRequest" parameter in the dbs. So it would be better if we can change this to suitable name. Appreciate any feedback on this.
Thanks, On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Rajith Vitharana <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Vidura, > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Vidura Gamini Abhaya <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Thanks Rajith. >> >> Would we still keep the semantics the same? i.e. client calls, >> >> stub.begin_requestbox(); >> stub.operation1(foo, bar); >> stub.operation2(bar); >> stub.end_requestbox(); >> > No it'll going to be a single call, which will be the one in the initial > mail. It will contain all the operations required within that. > >> >> How are we planning to get the code that does the collating on to the >> client? Would the users be forced to use a our tools to generate the stubs? >> > I don't think there will be any issue since we are providing WSDL with the > required operations, which will also contain new "request_box" operation as > well. > > Thanks, > > -- > Rajith Vitharana > > Software Engineer, > WSO2 Inc. : wso2.com > Mobile : +94715883223 > Blog : http://lankavitharana.blogspot.com/ > -- Rajith Vitharana Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. : wso2.com Mobile : +94715883223 Blog : http://lankavitharana.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
