Hi,

The initial use case I had with Log Analyzer was, as a general log analysis
tool, where users can just point to a log location, can be WSO2/non-WSO2
logs, and run queries against it / create dashboards. The concern I've with
integrating log analyzer also with our new analytics distributions is,
whether we will have some considering overlapping functionality between the
two. The DAS4X analytics effort is to basically create mostly the static
dashboards that would be there (maybe with alerts), which can be
successfully done by internally publishing all the events required for
those. But then, if we also say, you can/should use log analyzer (which is
a different UI/experience altogether) to create dashboards/queries, that we
missed from the earlier effort, that does not sound right.

So the point is, as I see, if we do the pure DAS4X solution right for a
product, they do not have an immediate need to use the log analysis
features again to do any custom analysis. But of course, if they want to
process the logs also nevertheless, they can setup the log analyzer product
and do it, for example, as a replacement to syslog, for centralized log
storage.

Cheers,
Anjana.

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Srinath Perera <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I believe we should integrate Log Analyzer with analytics distributions of
> the products.
>
> It is true some of the information you can take from Log analyzer is
> already available under normal analytics. For those, we do not need to use
> Log analyzer.
>
> However, log analyzer let us find and understand use cases that is not
> already instrumented. For example, when we see a error, we might check has
> a similar error happened before. Basically we can check ad-hoc dynamic use
> cases via log analyzer. Example of this is analytics done by our Cloud
> team.
>
> In general, log analyzer will be used by advanced users who will
> understand inner workings for the product. It will be a very powerful
> debugging tool.
>
> However, if we want to embed the log analyzer, then it is challenging due
> to ruby based log stash we use with log analyzer. I think in that case, we
> also need a java based log agent.
>
> Please comment.
>
> Thanks
> Srinath
> --
> ============================
> Blog: http://srinathsview.blogspot.com twitter:@srinath_perera
> Site: http://people.apache.org/~hemapani/
> Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/hemapani/
> Phone: 0772360902
>



-- 
*Anjana Fernando*
Senior Technical Lead
WSO2 Inc. | http://wso2.com
lean . enterprise . middleware
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to