Why do we need to know the count? What are the user stories?

 Also, this is for C4 based products? If so, IMO, this feature is not
something urgent to add to C4.

On Tuesday, February 9, 2016, Pushpalanka Jayawardhana <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> We are in the process of addressing following requirements related to
> getting the user count of user store.
>
> *Requirement*
> Mainly(in prority order),
>
>    1. *Get the count of users in a userstore domain*
>    2. Get the count of users within a tenant space
>    3. Get the count of users having a specific claim value (count the
>    results matching a specific claim value. eg: Number of users been locked,
>    Number of users from a specific country)
>
>
> Additionally following functionalities would be good to have,
>
>    1. Get the count of users across tenants
>
>
> ​
>
>
> *Approaches*
>
>    1. Keep a seperate database table to track the user count. Incrementally
>    update it each time a new user is added.
>       - When plugging an existing user store, the table needs to be
>          populated initially for once with existing user.
>          - PR at [1] creates a table 'IDN_UID_USER' to same user when
>          user name is renamed. It will be possible to use that table for this 
> same
>          requirement.
>          - This approach does *NOT* address 3rd requirement.
>       2. Execute a count query at user store manager level (This will be
>    an API addition to carbon kernel user core)
>       - This will cater for all the main requirements
>          - The LDAP protocol does not have a specific mentioning about an
>          API for count
>             - Different implementations have different approaches to
>             achieve this.
>                - OpenDS, Sundirectory server -
>                   
> https://blogs.oracle.com/Ludo/entry/ldap_tip_counting_the_number
>                   - OpenLDAP -
>                   
> http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Archive.Incoming?id=4161
>                - Implementing this in LDAP seems to be comparatively
>             harder than JDBC with having to manually go through the trees.
>             - With user stores having millions of users, the operation
>             will be very time consuming. (UI might be less responsive, if the 
> API is
>             used via mgt console)
>
> Appreciate your thoughts, inputs regarding this.
> @Kernel team : Appreciate your feed back on feasible time lines of
> releasing this new API integrated with user.core, if required to do so.
>
> [1] - Rename user https://github.com/wso2/carbon-identity/pull/437
> <https://github.com/wso2/carbon-identity/pull/437>
> [2] - LDAP Protocol - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4511
>
>
> Thanks,
> Pushpalanka.
> --
> Pushpalanka Jayawardhana, B.Sc.Eng.(Hons).
> Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Lanka (pvt) Ltd;  wso2.com/
> Mobile: +94779716248
> Blog: pushpalankajaya.blogspot.com/ | LinkedIn:
> lk.linkedin.com/in/pushpalanka/ | Twitter: @pushpalanka
>
>

-- 
S.Uthaiyashankar
VP Engineering
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - "lean . enterprise . middleware"

Phone: +94 714897591
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to